Evaluating the Efficacy of Alternative Methodologies to EU and UN SDG Air-Pollution Indicators
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Πανεπιστήμιο Πελοποννήσου
Abstract
Air pollution and air quality are major issues concerning a big part of Earth’s
population. In order to address these issues, among others, a global agenda called
“Sustainable Development Goals “was established. Under goal 11.6.2 lies a target
that implies that countries should reduce the adverse per capita environmental
impact of cities, including by paying special attention to air quality and municipal and
other waste management. Two approaches by the UN and Eurostat have created
two similar indictors, the UN SDG 11.6.2 and the Eurostat sdg_11_50. Both of them
examine the annual mean levels of fine particulate matter and are population
weighted. Since these approaches are sensitive to the definition of the city, SMURBS
suggests a different approach to the indicator, combining EO data and in situ
measurements and using objective city definitions. As a result, two indicators arise,
using the SMURBS UC approach and the SMURBS FUA approach.
The purpose of this study is to test if the SMURBS indicators provide a sufficient
alternative approach to the SDG 11.6.2 indicator, and Eurostat sdg_11_50, focusing
on European countries and how these are affected by different city definitions.
Description
Μ.Δ.Ε. 97
Keywords
Citation
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Αναφορά Δημιουργού-Μη Εμπορική Χρήση-Όχι Παράγωγα Έργα 3.0 Ελλάδα

